God new evidence

GOD: new evidence

Contents

No need for God?

'God and the New Atheists' #01

What's in the series?      Next: Faith and Evidence

Richard Dawkins and Daniel Dennett claim that science means there is no need for God. Michael Pool responds to this claim. The New Atheists say that science has done away with any need for God. But how good are their arguments? Michael Poole is the author of 'The New Atheism: ten arguments that don't hold water,' and is a visiting research fellow in Science and Religion at King's College London.

 

only search
'God: new evidence'

Site map


If you have a question chat now


Want to find out if God is real, and to connect with him?
Try Praying

Or get the app:


Keep in touch:

Facebook Facebook
TwitterTwitter

Interesting sites

Bethinking

Centre for Christianity in Society

Christian Evidence Society

Christians in Science

Professor Robin Collins

William Lane Craig - Reasonable Faith

The Demolition Squad

Professor Gary Habermas

Professor John Lennox

Reboot

Mike Licona - Risen Jesus

Saints and Sceptics

Solas

Test of Faith

Peter S Williams

‘A significant and growing number of scientists, historians of science and philosophers of science see more scientific evidence now for a personal creator and designer than was available fifty years ago.’ - M J Wilkins and J P Moreland