God new evidence

GOD: new evidence


A Careful Historian (part 1)

(Unwrapped: the Truth about Christmas #08)

What's in the series?      Previous: Contradictions?      Next: A Careful Historian (part 2)

Most of the events surrounding Jesus's birth were private events, remembered and circulated in the family. These were not public events that would be part of the history of the wider world of the Roman Empire. So two thousand years later, it is unlikely that we can prove them.

Does this mean that we have to either accept them on blind faith, or to reject them?  Well, no:

For example, Luke claims that he had investigated everything carefully, and had written an accurate account.  Of course, this does not prove that he did! But it does mean that he claimed he was writing real history.

To find out more read Luke 1:5 - 2:30

facebook logo To respond to this video go to www.facebook.com/godnewevidence.


only search
'God: new evidence'

Site map

If you have a question chat now

Want to find out if God is real, and to connect with him?
Try Praying

Or get the app:

Keep in touch:

Facebook Facebook

Interesting sites


Centre for Christianity in Society

Christian Evidence Society

Christians in Science

Professor Robin Collins

William Lane Craig - Reasonable Faith

The Demolition Squad

Professor Gary Habermas

Professor John Lennox


Mike Licona - Risen Jesus

Saints and Sceptics


Test of Faith

Peter S Williams

‘The laws of science, as we know them at present, contain many fundamental numbers… the values of these numbers seem to have been very finely adjusted to make possible the development of life.’ – Professor Stephen Hawking