God new evidence

GOD: new evidence

Contents

First Hand Knowledge

'Testing Luke' #03

 

What's in the series?      Previous: An Accurate Account      Next: Sergius Paulus

In Luke's account of the spread of Christianity in the book of Acts, in the Bible, there are several places where he changes from saying 'they did this or that' to saying 'we did this or that.' The implication is that he was there. What he writes is based on first-hand knowledge – he was an eye witness.

So some of the book of Acts, especially the last quarter, is based on Luke's first-hand knowledge – he was an eyewitness of the events he describes.

There is no good reason to reject Luke's claim to be an eyewitness, unless we start out with the prejudice that he cannot be telling the truth.

But we do not just have to accept his claim: there are many details in Luke's account that he gets right. Only someone who was there would know some of these details. We will look at some examples as we go on with this series.

To discuss this video please visit www.facebook.com/godnewevidence.

 

only search
'God: new evidence'

Site map


If you have a question chat now


Want to find out if God is real, and to connect with him?
Try Praying

Or get the app:


Keep in touch:

Facebook Facebook
TwitterTwitter

Interesting sites

Bethinking

Centre for Christianity in Society

Christian Evidence Society

Christians in Science

Professor Robin Collins

William Lane Craig - Reasonable Faith

The Demolition Squad

Professor Gary Habermas

Professor John Lennox

Reboot

Mike Licona - Risen Jesus

Saints and Sceptics

Solas

Test of Faith

Peter S Williams

‘We can't understand the Universe in any clear way without the supernatural.’
- Astronomer Allan Sandage