JavaScript DHTML Menu Powered by Milonic

God new evidence

GOD: new evidence

Contents

Where does our sense of justice come from?

(Beyond Ourselves #19)

Previous: Are right and wrong real?       Next: Can we be wrong about right and wrong?

Everyone wants to be treated fairly. We have a sense of how things ought to be.

We also see a lot of things that seem unfair. When we see or hear of something that we think is wrong, our basic response is to say 'that is not how things ought to be.'  We are offended by it, and want it to be put right.

But if we are only atoms and molecules, how can we explain this? How can one arrangement of atoms be 'right' and a different arrangement be 'wrong'? Surely they just are whatever they are? 

And where does our idea of how things ought to be come from?  If we are just the result of accidental processes of physics and chemistry, where does our sense of justice come from?  There is no way to account for it if we are just atoms and molecules.

Evolutionary biologists have tried to explain where our sense of right and wrong comes from in terms of natural selection. But even if they can explain how we have a sense of right and wrong, they cannot explain the existence of genuine right and wrong.

facebook logo To respond to this video go to www.facebook.com/godnewevidence.

 

only search
'God: new evidence'

Site map


Want to find out if God is real, and to connect with him?
Try Praying

Or get the app:


If you have a question chat now


Give to support our work


Keep in touch:

Facebook Facebook
TwitterTwitter
Get our quarterly newsletter 'In Focus' by email
* indicates required

Interesting sites

Bethinking

Christian Evidence Society

Christians in Science

Professor Robin Collins

William Lane Craig - Reasonable Faith

The Demolition Squad

Fixed Point Foundation

Professor Gary Habermas

Professor John Lennox

Reboot

Mike Licona - Risen Jesus

Saints and Sceptics

Test of Faith

Peter S Williams

‘The fact that we are just on the knife-edge of existence, if the dark energy were very much bigger we wouldn’t be here, that’s the mystery.’
- Professor Felix Bloch, Stanford University