JavaScript DHTML Menu Powered by Milonic

God new evidence

GOD: new evidence


He Just Can't Help It

(Beyond Ourselves #14)

Previous: True Beliefs?       Next: Time for an Alternative?

There is a contradiction built into the heart of naturalism: if naturalism is true, we cannot trust our own thinking. But this includes our thinking about whether naturalism is true. For example, the atheist writer Sam Harris claims in his book 'The Moral Landscape' that we are not responsible for what we think.  But is Sam Harris responsible for what he thinks? If not, he just cannot help thinking that… we are not not responsible for what we think. So why should we take seriously anything that he says?

facebook logo To respond to this video go to


only search
'God: new evidence'

Site map

Want to find out if God is real, and to connect with him?
Try Praying

Or get the app:

If you have a question chat now

Give to support our work

Keep in touch:

Facebook Facebook
Get our quarterly newsletter 'In Focus' by email
* indicates required

Privacy Notice

Interesting sites


Christian Evidence Society

Christians in Science

Professor Robin Collins

William Lane Craig - Reasonable Faith

The Demolition Squad

Fixed Point Foundation

Professor Gary Habermas

Professor John Lennox


Mike Licona - Risen Jesus

Saints and Sceptics

Test of Faith

Peter S Williams

‘Clearly there are religious implications whenever you start to discuss the origins of the Universe. There must be religious overtones. But I think most scientists prefer to shy away from the religious side of it.’- Professor Stephen Hawking