JavaScript DHTML Menu Powered by Milonic

God new evidence

GOD: new evidence

Contents

Real People: The High Priest Annas

'Testing Luke' #23

 

What's in the series?      Previous: The Appian Way      Next: Gamaliel

At one point early in the book of Acts, Luke says that the Jewish High Priest was a man called Annas. But Annas was not the High Priest at the time. So did Luke get it wrong? Was he inaccurate after all?

In Acts chapter 4, Luke records how the apostles Peter and John are arrested and hauled in front of the Jewish council. He says: 'Annas the high priest was there, along with Caiaphas, John, Alexander, and other relatives of the high priest.' But although Annas had been the High Priest from 6 AD to 15 AD, the Romans had thrown him out in 15 AD.

After he was thrown out, Annas continued to be one of the most influential leaders of the Jewish nation. Five of his sons became High Priests, as well as his son-in-law, Caiaphas. Many of the Jews thought that the Romans did not have any right to depose the High Priest. They continued to treat Annas as the High Priest.

So Luke is within his rights in calling Annas the High Priest. In fact earlier - in his Gospel - he talks about 'the high priesthood of Annas and Caiaphas.'

To discuss this video please visit www.facebook.com/godnewevidence.

 

only search
'God: new evidence'

Site map


Want to find out if God is real, and to connect with him?
Try Praying

Or get the app:


If you have a question chat now


Support our work


Keep in touch:

Facebook Facebook
TwitterTwitter
Get our quarterly newsletter 'In Focus' by email
* indicates required

Privacy Notice

Interesting sites

Bethinking

Centre for Christianity in Society

Christian Evidence Society

Christians in Science

Professor Robin Collins

William Lane Craig - Reasonable Faith

The Demolition Squad

Professor Gary Habermas

Professor John Lennox

Reboot

Mike Licona - Risen Jesus

Saints and Sceptics

Solas

Test of Faith

Peter S Williams

‘Although I was once sharply critical of the argument to design, I have since to come to see that, when correctly formulated, this argument constitutes a persuasive case for the existence of God.’ – Professor Anthony Flew