God new evidence

GOD: new evidence

Contents

He Just Can't Help It

(Beyond Ourselves #14)

What's in the series?      Previous: True Beliefs?       Next: Time for an Alternative?

There is a contradiction built into the heart of naturalism: if naturalism is true, we cannot trust our own thinking. But this includes our thinking about whether naturalism is true. For example, the atheist writer Sam Harris claims in his book 'The Moral Landscape' that we are not responsible for what we think.  But is Sam Harris responsible for what he thinks? If not, he just cannot help thinking that… we are not not responsible for what we think. So why should we take seriously anything that he says?

facebook logo To respond to this video go to www.facebook.com/godnewevidence.

 

only search
'God: new evidence'

Site map


If you have a question chat now


Want to find out if God is real, and to connect with him?
Try Praying


Keep in touch:

Facebook Facebook
TwitterTwitter

Interesting sites

Bethinking

Christianity in Society

Christian Evidence Society

Christians in Science

William Lane Craig - Reasonable Faith

Professor Gary Habermas

Professor John Lennox

Mike Licona - Risen Jesus

Solas

Test of Faith

‘Although I was once sharply critical of the argument to design, I have since to come to see that, when correctly formulated, this argument constitutes a persuasive case for the existence of God.’ – Professor Anthony Flew