God new evidence

GOD: new evidence

Contents

Dishonest spinning (Bad Faith #25)

What's in the series?      Previous: How to make a legend

In these programmes, we have been looking at the myth that science and faith are in conflict with each other.  We have looked at some key events that are supposed to show this conflict: the trial of Galileo in 1633; the ‘Great Debate’ in Oxford in 1860, between Thomas Henry Huxley and Samuel Wilberforce, and the Scopes ‘Monkey’ trial in Dayton, Tenessee in 1925.

The way people tell these stories is often spun as a story of science and faith in conflict. But the people who were there at the time would not have recognised this story.  Sometimes people tell these stories in genuine ignorance, because they have not bothered to find out the facts. But sometimes they tell these stories in a deliberately dishonest way. They do know better, but they have an agenda. They are telling them in bad faith.

facebook logo To respond to this video go to www.facebook.com/godnewevidence.

 

only search
'God: new evidence'

Site map


If you have a question chat now


Want to find out if God is real, and to connect with him?
Try Praying


Keep in touch:

Facebook Facebook
TwitterTwitter

Interesting sites

Bethinking

Christianity in Society

Christian Evidence Society

Christians in Science

William Lane Craig - Reasonable Faith

Professor Gary Habermas

Professor John Lennox

Mike Licona - Risen Jesus

Solas

Test of Faith

‘Although I was once sharply critical of the argument to design, I have since to come to see that, when correctly formulated, this argument constitutes a persuasive case for the existence of God.’ – Professor Anthony Flew